AI OPERATING SYSTEM FOR FIELD BIOLOGY

Prompt Nature.

Verifiable records, measured at your sites.

Environmental reporting is now mandatory across Europe, and regulators fine those who do not comply. The data behind those reports is still collected by hand, written down by hand, and carried to a laboratory by hand. LabGPT plans the campaign in software, collects the samples with autonomous drones, and returns results with the record of how they were produced.

LABGPT CAMPAIGN ENGINE / v5.1
SYSTEM ONLINE
OS

Compliance sampling campaign initialised. Designing mission, validating constraints and generating chain of custody for site NL-04.

Mission Design Sequence
30% COMPLETE

// COMPLIANCE CAMPAIGN — SITE NL-04

> LOADING SITE BOUNDARY [SITE_REF: NL-04]

> VALIDATING AIRSPACE AND GROUND CONSTRAINTS

> GENERATING SAMPLING DESIGN — 4 POINTS, QUARTERLY

> SIMULATING FLIGHT PATH IN 3D

> WRITING CHAIN OF CUSTODY — GPS + TIMESTAMP

> MAPPING RESULTS TO ESRS E2, E3, E4 DATAPOINTS...

MISSION STATUS

Site boundary loaded. Airspace clear. Sampling protocol grounded against ISO/IEC 17025. Chain of custody will record GPS coordinates and timestamp at the moment of collection.

Access Field Console
01 — THE PROBLEM

The uncertainty is in the field,
not the laboratory

Companies file these reports because regulators mandate them and fine those who do not comply. The data behind them is still collected by hand, written down by hand, and carried to a laboratory by hand.

In contaminated soil, more than 90% of the error in a result comes from how the sample was taken, not from how it was analysed. One study measured sampling error at over 20 times the analytical error.

That is why so much of this data cannot be reproduced. In a survey of 1,576 researchers, more than 50% could not reproduce their own results, and in ecology only 27% of published studies include the code needed to check them.

>90%
of the error in a soil result comes from sampling, not from the laboratory
Ramsey et al. (2019); Gustavsson et al. (2006)
<1%
of publicly reporting companies disclose their biodiversity impacts
IPBES (2026)
US$10.3bn
paid by 3M Company to settle PFAS claims from 11,000+ US public water systems, 2024
3M Company (2024)
REGULATION

The evidence requirements are rising

The EU Soil Monitoring Directive came into force in December 2025. ESRS E2, E3 and E4 require pollution, water and biodiversity to be reported for each individual site, and in Germany non-compliance carries fines to €10 million or 5% of group turnover, plus director liability. The obligation is no longer to report. It is to evidence.

HOW IT WORKS

From mission plan to auditable report

01

Plan

Live

Mission design, protocol, airspace validation and a 3D simulation. Live today at console.labgpt.com.

02

Collect

Autonomous collection across soil, water and vegetation, with coordinates and custody written at the moment of collection.

03

Analyse

Analysis at ISO/IEC 17025-accredited partner laboratories.

04

Report

Results returned against the ESRS, TNFD, GRI or SBTN datapoint each one answers.

Why we do this

The global goal agreed under the Kunming-Montreal framework is to halt and reverse nature loss by 2030 against a 2020 baseline, and reach full recovery by 2050. Most organisations cannot say what condition their sites are in, so they cannot say whether it is improving. Every programme here starts with a baseline, because without one there is nothing to recover towards.

SHORT EXPLAINERS

See it in action

Start with
one site

Book a 30-minute call. We will design and simulate a sampling mission for one of your sites, present it for your approval, and scope what a programme would cost.

Book a 30-minute call

References

  1. Ramsey, M. H., Ellison, S. L. R. & Rostron, P. (eds). Eurachem/EUROLAB/CITAC/Nordtest/AMC Guide: Measurement uncertainty arising from sampling, 2nd edn (Eurachem, 2019).
  2. Gustavsson, B., Luthbom, K. & Lagerkvist, A. Comparison of analytical error and sampling error for contaminated soil. J. Hazard. Mater. 138, 252–260 (2006).
  3. Baker, M. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature 533, 452–454 (2016).
  4. Culina, A. et al. Low availability of code in ecology. PLoS Biol. 18, e3000763 (2020).
  5. Directive (EU) 2025/2360 on soil monitoring and resilience. Off. J. Eur. Union (26 Nov 2025).
  6. CSRD-Umsetzungsgesetz (German CSRD Implementation Act), in force 1 January 2026.
  7. European Commission. Commission adopts revised sustainability reporting standards (3 July 2026).
  8. IPBES. Thematic Assessment Report on Business and Biodiversity (2026).
  9. 3M Company. Settlement with public water suppliers over PFAS in drinking water (2024).
  10. US EPA. Method 1633A (2024).
  11. Nature Positive Initiative. The Definition of Nature Positive (2023).
LabGPT

Prompt Nature.

Made in California with 🩷
© 2026 LABGPT. COMMITTED TO BIODIVERSITY.
Featured on Aura++Featured on Open-Launch
Featured on Aura++ Featured on Open-Launch