Services

From mission plan to
auditable report

What we do, what is running today, and how the record survives scrutiny.

THE SOLUTION

Four steps, one unbroken record

01

Plan

Live

Mission design, site selection, sampling protocol, airspace and constraint validation, and a 3D simulation of the flight. This part is live today at console.labgpt.com.

02

Collect

Autonomous sample collection across soil, water and vegetation. Coordinates, timestamp and custody transfer are written by the system at the moment of collection.

03

Analyse

Environmental DNA assessment for biodiversity and species presence, PFAS monitoring under EPA Method 1633A, and heavy metals screening. All analysis runs at ISO/IEC 17025-accredited partner laboratories.

04

Report

Results come back against the ESRS, TNFD, GRI or SBTN datapoint each one answers, at the resolution your filing needs. The full method-level record sits behind it if a regulator asks for a detailed audit.

TRANSPARENCY

What is available today

AVAILABLE NOW

Mission planning and simulation

AI mission design, site selection, protocol grounding, airspace validation, 3D simulation and chain-of-custody design.

Live at console.labgpt.com
PILOT PHASE

Drone collection and partner-lab analysis

Autonomous sampling with analysis at accredited partner laboratories. Available to first pilot customers on completion of our current hardware deployment.

ROADMAP

Autonomous micro-lab on site

Solar-powered on-site unit running DNA assays without shipping samples, cutting biological results from days to hours. In development.

ASSURANCE

Why it holds up in an audit

Assurance providers test whether a number traces back to a method and a measurement.

Same method, every round

Sampling and preservation follow a documented protocol, and that protocol is filed with the result, so an assurance provider can confirm nothing changed between rounds.

Traceable to source

Every result carries the coordinates, timestamp and custody chain it was collected under.

Two levels of detail

Headline indicators for the filing itself, and the full method-level record underneath for a regulator who asks for one.

Data and ownership

Data is held on EU-based servers and is GDPR compliant. You own it outright — you can export it, share it or sell it.

COMPLIANCE

What you are being measured against

EU SOIL MONITORING DIRECTIVE

IN FORCE DEC 2025

Soil health monitored against a common list of descriptors: organic carbon, erosion, compaction, contamination and soil biodiversity.

National law by December 2028. PFAS contaminant list within 18 months; public register of contaminated sites within ten years.

Directive (EU) 2025/2360

ESRS E2, E3 AND E4

REPORTING NOW

Pollution, water and biodiversity reported for each individual site.

Germany, since January 2026: fines to €10 million or 5% of group turnover, plus director liability.

CSRD-Umsetzungsgesetz (2026)

REVISED ESRS

ADOPTED JUL 2026

Mandatory datapoints cut by over 60%.

Fewer datapoints does not mean weaker evidence. The ones that remain still have to be supported.

European Commission (Jul 2026)

Results are also returned in the form the Science Based Targets Network requires for location-based target setting, and as the primary site data a natural capital account needs.

BEYOND COMPLIANCE

The same record has a second use

Compliance sets the deadline. The evidence a filing needs is the evidence a nature strategy needs.

Baseline and restoration

Measure a site before and after an intervention, and show the change is real.

Nature and biodiversity targets

Commitments backed by measured site data rather than desktop estimates.

Change over time

The same protocol every round, so movement reflects the site and not the contractor.

Natural capital

Measured inputs for valuing the natural assets held in your custody.

Ready to scope a programme?

Book a call and we will design a sampling mission for one of your sites.

Book a 30-minute call

References

  1. Ramsey, M. H., Ellison, S. L. R. & Rostron, P. (eds). Eurachem/EUROLAB/CITAC/Nordtest/AMC Guide: Measurement uncertainty arising from sampling, 2nd edn (Eurachem, 2019).
  2. Gustavsson, B., Luthbom, K. & Lagerkvist, A. Comparison of analytical error and sampling error for contaminated soil. J. Hazard. Mater. 138, 252–260 (2006).
  3. Baker, M. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature 533, 452–454 (2016).
  4. Culina, A. et al. Low availability of code in ecology. PLoS Biol. 18, e3000763 (2020).
  5. Directive (EU) 2025/2360 on soil monitoring and resilience. Off. J. Eur. Union (26 Nov 2025).
  6. CSRD-Umsetzungsgesetz (German CSRD Implementation Act), in force 1 January 2026.
  7. European Commission. Commission adopts revised sustainability reporting standards (3 July 2026).
  8. IPBES. Thematic Assessment Report on Business and Biodiversity (2026).
  9. 3M Company. Settlement with public water suppliers over PFAS in drinking water (2024).
  10. US EPA. Method 1633A (2024).
  11. Nature Positive Initiative. The Definition of Nature Positive (2023).
LabGPT

Prompt Nature.

Made in California with 🩷
© 2026 LABGPT. COMMITTED TO BIODIVERSITY.
Featured on Aura++Featured on Open-Launch
Featured on Aura++ Featured on Open-Launch